← Back to Research Library
Carbon CapturePublished: Dec 10, 2025

Thermodynamic Analysis of MEA-Based Carbon Capture for Industrial Flue Gas

Authors: Eng. Andrew Omwenga & Research Team
📄 Peer-Reviewed Technical Paper & Process Simulation Analysis

Executive Summary & Abstract

Chemical absorption using aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) is the state-of-the-art technology for industrial post-combustion decarbonization. This paper provides a rate-based thermodynamic analysis of 30 wt% MEA solvent systems in Aspen Plus, achieving 98.25% CO2 recovery with an optimized reboiler heat duty of 3.42 GJ/ton CO2.

Technical Investigation & Analysis

1. Executive Summary & Abstract

Post-combustion carbon capture and storage (CCUS) using aqueous alkanolamine solvents is vital for decarbonizing industrial power plants, cement kilns, and steel manufacturing facilities. Monoethanolamine (MEA) at 30 wt% concentration remains the benchmark solvent due to its high reaction kinetics and high CO2 absorption capacity.

However, the primary barrier to widespread industrial deployment is the massive thermal energy penalty required to regenerate rich amine solvent in the stripper reboiler. This paper provides a rate-based thermodynamic simulation of post-combustion carbon capture in Aspen Plus using Electrolyte-NRTL kinetics, achieving 98.25% CO2 recovery while minimizing reboiler heat duty to 3.42 GJ/ton CO2.

2. Thermodynamic Property Method & Chemical Equilibrium

Industrial flue gas contains 12.0 mol% CO2, 75.2 mol% N2, 8.5 mol% H2O, and 4.3 mol% O2 at atmospheric pressure. Modeling liquid-phase ionic speciation requires the Electrolyte-NRTL (ELECNRTL) property package to account for electrolyte activity coefficients, vapor-liquid-liquid equilibrium (VLLE), and acid-base reaction kinetics.

Key Chemical Reactions Modeled:

•MEA Protonation: MEA + H+ <-> MEAH+
•Carbamate Formation: 2 MEA + CO2 <-> MEACOO- + MEAH+
•Water Dissociation: 2 H2O <-> H3O+ + OH-
•Bicarbonate Formation: CO2 + OH- <-> HCO3-

3. Absorber & Stripper Column Configuration

The capture plant was modeled using rigorous rate-based RadFrac column blocks in Aspen Plus:

•CO2 Absorber Column: 24 Packed Stages (Mellapak 250Y structured packing), operating at 1.05 bar and 40 °C feed temperature.
•Rich Amine Pump & Heat Exchanger: Rich amine preheated from 48 °C to 105 °C by lean amine stream in a plate heat exchanger.
•Stripper Column: 16 Packed Stages, top pressure 1.85 bar, reboiler operating at 121 °C to prevent thermal solvent degradation.

4. Key Performance Results & Energy Benchmarks

•CO2 Recovery Rate: 98.25% achieved across absorber column.
•Stripper Reboiler Heat Duty: 3.42 GJ / metric ton CO2 captured.
•Rich Amine CO2 Loading: 0.48 mol CO2 / mol MEA.
•Lean Amine CO2 Loading: 0.21 mol CO2 / mol MEA.

5. Sensitivity Analysis & Heat Integration Findings

Optimizing the rich/lean heat exchanger minimum temperature approach (LMTD) from 10 °C down to 5 °C reduced reboiler energy consumption by 14.5%. Furthermore, intercooling the absorber column at stage 12 suppressed temperature bulges, increasing CO2 mass transfer rates and lowering required lean amine recirculation flow by 8.2%.

6. Conclusion & Decarbonization Outlook

Rate-based simulation in Aspen Plus provides precise thermal energy targets for industrial CCUS retrofits. Optimizing rich/lean heat exchange and absorber intercooling drastically reduces utility overhead, paving the way for economically sustainable carbon capture deployment.

Have questions about this research paper?

Contact our consulting lab to discuss industrial applications, thermodynamic model validation, or custom simulations.

Ask About This Research