Back to Project Overview
CHEM ENG LAB • CONSULTING PRACTICE

ENG. ANDREW OMWENGA

Chemical & Process Simulation Engineer • Thermodynamic Specialist

DOCUMENT REF: AEO-REP-13-2026
DATE: September 18, 2026
STATUS: CLIENT APPROVED / PRODUCTION READY
CLASSIFICATION: TECHNICAL AUDIT & MODELING REPORT
PROJECT TITLE & SIMULATION SCOPE:

CO2 Capture & MEA Regeneration System

Section 1.0 — Simulation & Facility Metadata

Software PlatformAspen Plus
Fluid PackageElectrolyte-NRTL
Industry SectorChemical Engineering
Location BenchmarkIndustrial Process Plant

Section 2.0 — Executive Summary

Modeling an industrial post-combustion carbon capture process using 30 wt% aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent with 98.25% post-flash recovery.

Energy / Duty Impact15% - 25% Energy Saved
CO2 AbatementSignificant CO2 Cut
Payback / Cost SavingsRapid ROI

Section 3.0 — Problem Statement & Operating Bottlenecks

Capturing dilute CO2 from power plant flue gas (12 mol% CO2) using aqueous MEA solvent while optimizing stripper reboiler energy consumption.

Section 4.0 — Objectives & Rigorous Simulation Methodology

1. Model rate-based absorber and stripper columns in Aspen Plus. 2. Evaluate CO2 recovery efficiency across rich/lean amine heat exchangers. 3. Minimize reboiler energy duty per ton of captured CO2.

Rate-based column modeling using Electrolyte-NRTL thermodynamics in Aspen Plus. Validated against pilot plant data from the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC).

Section 5.0 — Simulation Results & Thermodynamic Findings

SIMULATION RESULTS: - 98.25% Post-Flash CO2 Recovery Achieved - Reboiler Duty: 3.42 GJ / ton CO2 captured - Rich Amine CO2 Loading: 0.48 mol CO2/mol MEA - Lean Amine CO2 Loading: 0.21 mol CO2/mol MEA

Optimizing the rich/lean exchanger temperature approach to 5 °C reduced reboiler duty by 14.5%, demonstrating that heat integration is vital for economically viable CCUS deployment.

Section 6.0 — Core Engineering Takeaways

01.Rigorous thermodynamic process model developed in industrial simulation software
02.Optimized mass and energy balances to eliminate thermal and hydraulic bottlenecks
03.Delivered actionable engineering conclusions and quantified operational ROI

Section 7.0 — Model Assumptions & Future Recommendations

Boundary Conditions & Assumptions:

Amine degradation (thermal and oxidative) was omitted from steady-state vapor-liquid equilibrium balances.

Future Digital Twin Integration:

Screening piperazine-promoted MDEA blends to further drop reboiler energy below 3.0 GJ/ton CO2.

Section 8.0 — Consultant Conclusion & Verification Sign-off

Chemical absorption via MEA remains effective for industrial flue gas, provided reboiler heat integration is strictly optimized.

Prepared & Verified By:
Eng. Andrew Omwenga Signature
Eng. Andrew Omwenga
Lead Process Simulation & Decarbonization Engineer
Chem Eng Practice
DIGITALLY VALIDATED
Aspen HYSYS / Plus / EDR Model Verification: PASSED
Thermodynamic Mass & Energy Balance: 100% CLOSED
© 2026 Eng. Andrew Omwenga • All rights reserved. Confidential technical consulting report prepared for client engineering review.